Legal Opinion
Elisio Cisneros-Ledesma v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 28, 1994No. 93-70262Published
1Opinion of the Court
45 F.3d 435
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Elisio CISNEROS-LEDESMA, Petitioner,
v.
IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.
No. 93-70262.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Nov. 17, 1994.*
Decided Dec. 28, 1994.
Before: LAY,** PREGERSON, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges.
1
MEMORANDUM***
2
Petitioner Eliseo Cisneros-Ledesma appeals the Board of…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Woodby v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Maryam Hartooni v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Mehdi Abedini v. U.S. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Roman Agmata Baliza v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Rolando Cunanan v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.