Legal Opinion
O'NEILL v. Stanwood Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 24, 1984No. 83 Civ. 8330 (JFK)PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
KEENAN, District Judge:
Defendants move, pursuant to Title 28, section 1404(a) of the United States Code, for an order transferring this action to the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, where a second suit between the parties is pending. Alternatively, defendants move for an order requiring plaintiff to file a more definite statement pursuant to rule 12(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.. For the reasons stated hereafter, the motion for a transfer is granted. Because this case is being transferred to the Western…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Factors Etc., Inc. And Boxcar Enterprises Inc. v. Pro Arts, Inc. And Stop and Shop Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Y4 Design, Ltd. v. Regensteiner Publishing Enterprises, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1977
3Cited by11 opinions
- Cali v. East Coast Aviation Services., Ltd.District Court, E.D. New York · 2001
- Tingley Systems, Inc. v. Bay State HMO Management, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 1993
- San Shoe Trading Corp. v. Converse Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- Town of Warwick v. New Jersey Department of Environmental ProtectionDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- Anchor Savings Bank v. Transamerica Ins. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.