Legal Opinion

Allen v. Bowen

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided March 10, 1987No. 85 C 8031PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

MORAN, District Judge.

Henri, Gerome and Edmund Allen, by their mother and next friend Geraldine Allen, seek Social Security child’s insurance benefits under 42 U.S.C. § 402(d) on the wage record of the late Henry Ellis. They appeal from the Secretary’s determination that they have not sufficiently proven their status as Henry’s children under either 42 U.S.C. §§ 416(h)(2)(A) or 416(h)(3)(C)(ii). They ask for reversal and an award of benefits. The Secretary admits that the administrative law judge (ALJ) erroneously imposed a burden of clear and convincing proof on claimants…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Weber v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Jimenez v. WeinbergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. In Re Estate of RagenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  5. Catharine TAYLOR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Richard S. SCHWEIKER, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Allen v. BowenDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1987
  2. Kinney ex rel. Kinney v. SullivanDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API