Legal Opinion

James E. Zoph v. Jacob Bailey

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided August 24, 2026No. 1:25-cv-13237Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION JAMES E. ZOPH, Petitioner, Case No. 25-cv-13237 v. Judge Mary M. Rowland JACOB BAILEY, Respondent. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Petitioner James E. Zoph, a prisoner at Hill Correctional Center, brings two pro se petitions under

28 U.S.C. § 2254

(“Section 2254”) challenging his conviction for first-degree murder. Respondent Jacob Bailey, Warden of Hill Correctional Center, opposes the petitions as time barred. For the following reasons, the Court dismisses the Section 2254 petitions as untimely. I.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Gonzalez v. ThalerSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  3. Duncan v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. Lawrence v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Thomas Socha v. Gary BoughtonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API