Legal Opinion

People v. Campbell

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 2003No. 94425PublishedCited by 83 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thomas

At issue in this case is whether defense counsel, by stipulating to the admission of evidence, can waive a defendant’s constitutional right to confront the source of the evidence without the defendant’s knowing consent to the stipulation. The appellate court, with one justice dissenting, held that defense counsel can stipulate to prosecution testimony without a defendant’s knowing consent because the decision to stipulate is a matter of trial strategy within defense counsel’s sound judgment. 332 Ill. App. 3d 808. The dissent believed that the decision whether to stipulate to the testimony of…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Brookhart v. JanisSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Diaz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  5. People v. RameyIllinois Supreme Court · 1992

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by83 opinions

  1. People v. BuieMichigan Supreme Court · 2012
  2. People v. RowellIllinois Supreme Court · 2008
  3. People v. LeachIllinois Supreme Court · 2012
  4. People v. MedinaIllinois Supreme Court · 2006
  5. People v. AverettAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008

78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API