Legal Opinion
Muraresku v. Amoco Oil Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided November 13, 1986No. Civ. A. 84-390PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
CAHN, District Judge.
Plaintiff Raymond Muraresku is a former franchisee of defendant Amoco Oil Company. On October 28, 1982 Amoco notified plaintiff that his lease, which expired January 31, 1983, would not be renewed. Plaintiff brought this suit claiming that the nonrenewal of his lease was in violation of the Petroleum Marketing Practices Act (PMPA), 15 U.S.C. § 2801 et seq.
The case went to trial in February of 1985 before Chief Judge Alfred L. Luongo and a jury. Three issues were submitted to the jury by special interrogatory:
1. Did AMOCO determine not to renew Mr.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- William C. Brach, Cross-Appellant v. Amoco Oil Company, a Maryland Corporation, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- Institutionalized Juveniles v. Secretary of Public WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Black Grievance Committee v. Philadelphia Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- Huntley v. Community School Board Of BrooklynCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States Football League v. National Football LeagueDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989