Legal Opinion

Moberley's Guardian v. Mt. Sterling National Bank

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided March 9, 1920PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Montgomery Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Settle

Affirming.

*404In this action brought in the court below by the infant appellants, C. 0. Moberley, W. II. Moberley -and their statutory guardian, against the appellees, Mt. Sterling National Bank and W. S. Lloyd, its president, recovery was sought of one and two-thirds shares of the bank’s capital stock of the alleged market value of $1,000.00, and certain accrued dividends thereon, of which the infant appellants claimed to be the owners, but of which, as alleged, they had wrongfully been deprived by a conspiracy between the appellees looking to and resulting in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Harris' AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  2. Neely v. MerrittCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1872
  3. Howard v. Howard's ex'rCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1868
  4. Givens v. FlanneryCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1899
  5. Crenshaw v. Ware's Exor.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Heffner's Ex'r v. BeauchampCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1944
  2. Penick v. White & BeauchampCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API