Legal Opinion

State v. Strode

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 8, 2009No. 80849-0PublishedCited by 108 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlexander, C.J.

¶1 We have plainly articulated the guidelines that every trial court must follow before it closes a courtroom to the public. State v. Bone-Club, 128 Wn.2d 254, 258-59, 906 P.2d 325 (1995). In the Bone-Club case, we held that a courtroom may be closed to the public only when the criteria for closure identified in that case are satisfied. Here, the trial court violated Tony Strode’s right to a public trial by conducting a portion of jury selection in the trial judge’s chambers in unexceptional circumstances without first performing the required Bone-Club analysis. This is a structural error…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. Waller v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Riverside Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Estes v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. State v. Bone-ClubWashington Supreme Court · 1995

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by108 opinions

  1. State v. WiseWashington Supreme Court · 2012
  2. State v. IrbyWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  3. State v. LormorWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  4. In re the Personal Restraint of MorrisWashington Supreme Court · 2012
  5. State v. LoveWashington Supreme Court · 2015

103 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API