Legal Opinion

Donald Williams, Petitioner-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Carl S. Anderson, Respondent-Appellant/cross-Appellee

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided August 28, 2006No. 04-3515, 04-3585Published

1Opinion of the Court 1

460 F.3d 789

Donald WILLIAMS, Petitioner-Appellee/Cross-Appellant,

v.

Carl S. ANDERSON, Respondent-Appellant/Cross-Appellee.

No. 04-3515.

No. 04-3585.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Argued: March 14, 2006.

Decided and Filed: August 28, 2006.

COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED ARGUED: Matthew C. Hellman, Office of the Attorney General, Columbus, Ohio, for Appellant. Timothy F. Sweeney, Law Office of Timothy Farrell Sweeney, Cleveland, Ohio, for Appellee. ON BRIEF: Heather L. Gosselin, Office of the Attorney General, Columbus, Ohio, Daniel R.…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Clay; Concurrence.

2Cases cited61 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API