Legal Opinion

Shine v. Campanella & Cardi Construction Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 1, 1961PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, C.J.

The plaintiff, while operating his automobile, was hurt in a collision with a truck owned by the corporate defendant and operated by the defendant Fortin. This action of tort was referred to an auditor whose findings of fact were not to be final. He found for the defendant. A motion by the plaintiff to strike portions of the report was allowed. The ease was later tried before an other judge sitting with jury, who returned verdicts for the plaintiff. The only exception is to the action on the motion to strike.

The defendants contend that the judge’s action on the report did not comply with G-.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gleason v. Hardware Mutual Casualty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1954
  2. Papetti v. AlicandroMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  3. Falzone v. BurgoyneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
  4. Davis v. NooneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1960

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Goulet v. Whitin MacHine Works, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
  2. M. DeMatteo Construction Co. v. Board of AppealsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1975
  3. Potter v. John Bean Division of Food Machinery & Chemical Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962
  4. Commonwealth v. AckersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
  5. Baldassare v. Crown Furniture Co. Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API