Legal Opinion

Earle v. Peterson

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1879PublishedCited by 10 opinions

From the Porter Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtNiblack, J.

The appellant, John G. Earle, commenced this suit in 1872, in the Lake Circuit Court, alleging that *505he was the owner of one undivided half of section 19, township 36 north, range 7 west, in Lake county, and that the appellees, Andrew Peterson and Ingle Radstrom, were the owners of the other half, but that, by some title unknown to the appellant, they claimed to own the whole section, and praying that the title to one-half of said section might he quieted in him, and for partition.

Alfred Morrison was afterward, upon his own application, made a party defendant.

One trial of the cause was had in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Steeple v. DowningIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Glidewell v. SpaughIndiana Supreme Court · 1866
  3. Grant v. WestfallIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Reeves v. PloughIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  5. Gallion v. M'CaslinIndiana Supreme Court · 1820

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. CavittIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. McAllister v. HendersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Cole v. WrightIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Bandy v. MYERSIndiana Court of Appeals · 1967
  5. Bumgardner v. EdwardsIndiana Supreme Court · 1882

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API