Legal Opinion

In Re Schivo

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nevada

Decided October 13, 2011No. 19-10585PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BRUCE A. MARKELL, Bankruptcy Judge.

Table of Contents

I.Facts.767

A. BAPCPA and the Dismissal of Twenty-Five Bankruptcy Cases.768

B. The April Fool’s Day Press Release.769

G. Proceedings Related to Mr. Huntsman’s Motion to Re-Open.770

D. Mr. Huntsman’s Motion to Redact and Related Proceedings.772

II.Analysis of Mr. Huntsman’s Violations of Rule 9011 776

A. The Press Release Was Obviously Fake. 776

B. The Requirements of Rule 9011 . 776

C. Mr. Huntsman’s Violations of Rule 9011. 778

1. Violation of Rule 9011(b)(2). 778

a. The Motion to Re-Open. 778

b. The Motion to Redact . 779

2. Violation of Rule…

Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
Richard L. Zaldivar v. City of Los Angeles, and Margaret Salazar, Intervenors-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
Townsend v. Holman Consulting Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
Mars Steel Corp. v. Continental Bank N.A.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
Christian v. Mattel, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

In Re SpickelmierUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nevada · 2012
Daniel E. Lewis and Tami L. LewisUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Arkansas · 2022