Legal Opinion

Medrano v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 9, 1998No. 98-2371PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

We have for review a pro se sworn petition for writ of habeas corpus where petitioner requests that he be permitted to file a belated rule 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief, based on the ineffective assistance of privately-retained post-conviction counsel in failing to file a rule 3.850 motion on petitioner’s behalf, although hired to do so. Petitioner believes that he is now barred by the two-year time limitation in rule 3.850(b) from pursuing his motion in the trial court because mandate issued in the direct appeal on March 13,1995. Since petitioner has not yet filed a rule 3.850…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lambrix v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1996
  2. Steele v. KehoeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Medrano v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
  2. Strong v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API