Legal Opinion
Medrano v. State
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided October 14, 1999No. 93,997PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
748 So.2d 986 (1999)
Acencion MEDRANO, Petitioner,
v.
STATE of Florida, et al., Respondents.
No. 93,997.
Supreme Court of Florida.
October 14, 1999.
Acencion Medrano, Belle Glade, Florida, Petitioner, pro se.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Celia Terenzio and Carol Cobourn Asbury, Assistant Attorneys General, West Palm Beach, Florida, for Respondent.
QUINCE, J.
Acencion Medrano (Medrano) seeks relief in this Court based on the following question certified by the Fourth District Court of Appeal to be of great public importance:
IS A PETITIONER ENTITLED TO FILE A BELATED RULE 3.850 MOTION.…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Steele v. KehoeSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
- Steele v. KehoeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
- Medrano v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
3Cited by21 opinions
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
- State v. SteeleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Krasnick v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
- State v. HillDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
- Medrano v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.