Legal Opinion

Parker v. Hastings

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1859PublishedCited by 13 opinions

APPEAL from the Ripley Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtPerkins, J.

The assignment of errors in this case is as follows:

“ State of Indiana, set. In the Supreme Court.
“ Samuel Parker, Freeman Munger, Stephen Merrill, and Joseph Zaner v. David Hastings.

■ “ Appeal from the Ripley Circuit. Court..

“ Come the said appellants by Jonathan W. Gordon, their attorney,, and say there is manifest error appealing in the record and proceedings of the above entitled cause, in this, to-wit:
“ 1. The jury found contrary to law.
“2. The jury found contrary to evidence.
*655“3. The Court below modified charges asked by the defendants, which modifications were contrary to law.
“4. The…

2Cited by13 opinions

  1. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. GranthamIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Robbins v. MageeIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  3. City of Anderson v. NealIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Maynard v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. Millikan v. State ex rel. BishopIndiana Supreme Court · 1880

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API