Legal Opinion

Quanah, A. & P. RY. Co. v. Collier

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided November 12, 1919No. 87-2893PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.

Defendants in error, Collier and Chalk, sued the plaintiff in error, Qua-nah, Acme & Pacific Railway Company, for damages to 11 carloads of cattle, on account of delay in shipment. The trial resulted in a judgment for defendants in error, and the Court of Civil Appeals affirmed the judgment. 179 S. W. 96.

The cattle were loaded on plaintiff in error’s cars at Roaring Springs, Tex., for shipment to Kansas City, wilji the privilege of the Oklahoma City market. The route of' shipment designated was to Quanah, Tex., over the plaintiff in error’s line, and from that point to Kansas City, via…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Houston Direct Navigation Co. v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  2. R. Knight & Co. v. Southern Pacific RailroadTexas Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Quanah, A. & P. Ry. Co. v. CollierCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dr. Pepper Bottling Co. v. Rain-BoldtCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  2. Westchester Fire Ins. Co. v. DickeyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API