McCartney v. State

Frank McCartney, plaintiff in error (hereinafter referred to as defendant), was convicted upon each of three counts of an information, each charging a violation of the liquor laws. Sentences conforming to the statute were imposed. Defendant brings the record of his conviction to this court for review.

It is first contended that the court erred in permitting the county attorney to indorse on the information the name of a witness, Knolie Shaw Nelson, after the trial had commenced. The record discloses that after the impanelment of the jury Nelson was called to the witness-stand, sworn, and asked…