Rocha v. Sauder Woodworking Co.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
CARR, District Judge.
This is an action under the Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA), 29 U.S.C.A. § 2611, et seq. Pending is defendants’ motion for summary judgment. For the reasons that follow, the motion shall be granted with regard to plaintiffs federal claim. The plaintiffs pendent state claims shall be dismissed without a ruling on their merits, and without prejudice to her right to refile such claims in state court.
Plaintiff was employed by the defendant Sauder Woodworking from November 1, 1999, until April 17, 2001. While there is some dispute about the number of hours she worked…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Payne v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Heckler v. Community Health Services of Crawford County, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Helvering v. HallockSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- State Oil Co. v. KhanSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Nancy Kosakow v. New Rochelle Radiology Associates, P.C.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Carla Mutchler v. Dunlap Memorial Hospital Kathy LoedeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Welty v. Honda of America Mfg., Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2005
- Massengill v. Anderson County Board of EducationDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2007
- Mutchler v. Dunlap Memorial HospCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007