Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part
Heath Adkisson v. Blytheville School District 5
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided August 31, 2015No. 14-3746Published
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partBeam, Circuit Judge
I concur in the court’s general explication concerning the former, and partly applicable, terms and conditions of the “broad school choice transfer option[s],” Teague v. Cooper, 720 F.3d 973, 975 (8th Cir.2013), contained in Arkansas Code Annotated § 6-18-1901 et seq., the Public School Choice Act of 2013 (the 2013 Act). I also concur in the court’s conclusion that a portion of this appeal was mooted by the Arkansas General Assembly’s repeal of former § 6 — 18—1906(b), the transfer exemption portion of the 2013 Act, upon its enactment of Arkansas Code Annotated § 6-13-113.
I likewise agree…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Goss v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Pasadena City Board of Education v. SpanglerSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Ron Teague v. Arkansas Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
- Fisher v. Tucson Unified School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Mazevski v. Horseheads Central School DistrictDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.