Legal Opinion
Falcon Petroleum Co. v. Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co.
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided February 13, 1990No. 73269PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
HANSEN, Presiding Judge:
Appellant Panhandle appeals from an order of the trial court granting arbitration in part and denying arbitration in part on a gas purchase agreement between the parties.
On June 20, 1978, Panhandle (Buyer) negotiated a “take or pay” gas purchase agreement with Falcon (Seller) wherein Seller agreed to sell and Buyer agreed to purchase all of Seller’s interest in and to the natural gas under certain wells producing from the Chester formation in Texas and Beaver Counties, Oklahoma. The agreement was to remain in full force and effect for a term of five…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Southland Corp. v. KeatingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- The Procter & Gamble Independent Union of Port Ivory, N.Y. v. The Procter & Gamble Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- City of Midwest City v. HarrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Green Tree Servicing, L.L.C. v. FisherCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2007
- Gitgood v. Howard Pontiac-GMC, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2002
- Gitgood v. Howard Pontiac-GMC, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2002