Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Garner
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
YOUNG, Justice.
Appellee brought suit against the Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company for injuries sustained while employed as a checker in one of the local stores of that concern. Appellant, though eligible, did not elect to come under the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Act, Vernon’s Ann. Civ. St. art. 8306 et seq.; hence, the action is one at common law, charging negligence of the employer; i. e., a failure to exercise ordinary care in the matter of providing plaintiff Garner with a safe place in which to work.
Following a jury verdict, judgment was rendered against appellant for…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Comanche Duke Oil Co. v. Texas Pac. Coal & Oil Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1927
- French v. Southwestern Telegraph & Telephone Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1913
- French v. Southwestern Telegraph & Telephone Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1920
- Cookville Coal & Lumber Co. v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
3Cited by14 opinions
- Honea, by Next Friend v. Coca Cola Bot. Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1944
- Pate v. Texline Feed Mills, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1985
- Rash v. RossCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963
- Kiel v. MahanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948
- S. H. Kress & Company v. H. A. TelfordCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.