Kiel v. Mahan
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
McDONALD, Chief Justice.
Plaintiff’s suit for damages is based on the claim that his wife suffered personal injuries as a result of inhaling chlorine gas which defendant negligently permitted to escape in the vicinity of a swimming pool operated by defendant. Plaintiff recovered judgment for $8,186.95 on a jury verdict ' finding defendant guilty of negligence. Defendant has appealed, presenting ten points of error.
The first three points of error complain of the refusal of the court to submit three requested issues to the jury. The first of the refused issues inquired if plaintiff’s wife…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gillette Motor Transport Co. v. WhitfieldTexas Supreme Court · 1947
- Safety Casualty Co. v. TeetsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946
- McCrory's Stores Corp. v. MurphyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
- City of Coleman v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. GarnerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Cagle v. McQueen Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. Gulf Oil Corp. McQueen v. Cagle. Gulf Oil Corp. v. CagleCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953
- Martin v. Shell Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1953
- Rash v. RossCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963
- Eddleman v. ScalcoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Harvey v. Crockett Drilling Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1951
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.