Legal Opinion
Chapman v. Mason
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided December 12, 1911No. 1396PublishedCited by 13 opinions
Error from District Court, Hughes County; John Caruthers, Judge. Action by Robert and Mary A. Mason, plaintiffs below, defendants in error, against J. A. Chapman, defendant below, .plaintiff in error. From an order granting a new trial, plaintiff in error brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
SHARP, C.
Defendants in error, Robert and Mary A. Mason, sued plaintiff in error, J. A. Chapman, for damages arising out of the sale of,120 acres of land in the Creek Nation, Indian Territory, now situated in Hughes county, Okla. The deed thereto contained the following covenants of warranty:
“And I, the said J. A. Chapman, for myself and my heirs, executors, or administrators, do covenant with the said party of the second part, his heirs and assigns, that the said property is free from all incumbrances; that I have good right to sell and convey the said property; and that I will and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hogan v. BaileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- City of Sedan v. ChurchSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
- Trower v. RobertsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
- Cit. State Bank of Lawton v. Chattanooga State BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Sanders v. WakefieldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1889
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Hughes v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. WootenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Rogers v. QuabnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Missouri, K. & T. R. Co. v. JamesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Sharp v. Choctaw Ry. & Lighting Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.