Legal Opinion

Jim Austin Olds-Cadillac & Toyota Co. v. Gaspard

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 8, 1979No. 8364PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KEITH, Justice.

Defendant below appeals from an adverse judgment in a suit brought under the Deceptive Trade Practices — Consumer Protection Act (“DTPA”), Tex.Bus. & Comm. Code Ann. § 17.41, et seq. (Supp. 1978-79). The trial was to a jury and the judgment awards treble damage and attorney’s fees.

Plaintiff’s automobile needed repairs and he took it to defendant’s place of business. The repairs were made to the engine and plaintiff paid the defendant $915 therefor. Shortly thereafter, plaintiff began to experience mechanical difficulties with the engine and took it to defendant for further…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Garza v. AlviarTexas Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Spradling v. WilliamsTexas Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Lucas v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1977
  4. American Transfer & Storage Co. v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  5. Success Motivation Institute, Inc. v. LawlisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Tom Benson Chevrolet, Inc. v. AlvaradoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982
  2. Potere, Inc. v. National Realty ServiceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1984
  3. Hogge v. KimbrowCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982
  4. Tom Benson Chevrolet, Inc. v. AlvaradoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API