Legal Opinion

Robison v. City of Wichita Falls

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 9, 1930No. 3385PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHall, C. J.

The appellant, Robison, sued the city of Wichita Falls to recover damages in the sum of $25,000, alleging that while he was an employee óf said city, working in its sanitary department, the city furnished him with disinfecting powder to be used in the perform- anee of Ms duties in said department; that said powder was extremely irritating to his eyes, and the use of same resulted in finally destroying his eyesight, tie alleges that he' is a man of extremely low order of intelligence, and did not know of the dangei;.

The city answered hy a general demurrer and four exceptions. The court…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. City of Galveston v. PosnainskyTexas Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Ostrom v. City of San AntonioTexas Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Whitfield v. City of ParisTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Humphreys Oil Co. v. LilesTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925
  5. White v. City of San AntonioTexas Supreme Court · 1901

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. City of Wichita Falls v. RobisonTexas Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API