Peavey v. Crawford

Atkinson, Presiding Justice.

At a previous trial of the issues here involved, to wit, those arising on an application to pro bate a will, and a caveat there! o, the jury found for the caveators; and this court, upon a reviewqtf the grounds of the caveat and the testimony, held that the trial court erred in overruling the motion for new trial, “for the legal evidence demanded a verdict probating the will, and the verdict rendered was contrary to law.” Peavey v. Crawford, 182 Ga. 782. The grounds of caveat were undue influence and mental incapacity. On the last trial the caveat was amended, but…