Commonwealth v. Valdez
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtGants, C.J.
Under G. L. c. 278, § 29D, where a judge fails to advise a defendant during the plea colloquy that conviction may have the consequence of exclusion from admission to the United States, the conviction must be vacated upon motion of the defendant if the defendant shows that his or her conviction “may have” that consequence. The issue on appeal is what the defendant must show to establish that his conviction “may have” the consequence of exclusion from admission to the United States. We conclude that a defendant satisfies this burden by showing (1) that he has a bona fide desire to leave the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Commonwealth v. LopezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
- Commonwealth v. VillalobosMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
- Idy v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
- Commonwealth v. RzepphiewskiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
- Commonwealth v. GianninoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Commonwealth v. Petit-HommeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2019
- Commonwealth v. DiasMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2018
- Commonwealth v. Jean-LouisMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2023
- Commonwealth v. LysMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2017