People v. Barfield
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lasak, J.), dated August 4, 2009, which, after a hearing to redetermine his sex offender risk level pursuant to the stipulation of settlement in Doe v Pataki (3 F Supp 2d 456 [SD NY 1998]), designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The People established by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant had previously been convicted of a felony sex crime. Therefore, he was presumptively a level three sex offender…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People v. WyattAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Doe v. PatakiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- People v. AbdullahAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- People v. MadisonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. EatonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. BarrAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
- People v. BerryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- People v. WolmAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
- People v. IliffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- People v. GoodsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.