Legal Opinion

Cosden Oil Co. v. Scarborough

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided February 1, 1932No. 6124PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge.

rni . . _ n f us is an appeal from a decree finding a-ppellant, defendant below, m default m the performance of implied covenants to prosecute with reasonable diligence the development for oil and gas of a tract of 400 acres of land, assigned to it by the lessee of a tract of 10,254 acres, and directing, upon pam of cancellaaon, that it pi oceed on terms fixed m the decree to drill at least one well thereon.

Appellant complains of ^ the decree as without evidence to support it. It contends that the evidence shows that the lands held by it are part of an indivisible…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Waggoner Estate v. Sigler Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Texas Pacific Coal & Oil Co. v. BarkerTexas Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Masterson v. Amarillo Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1923
  4. Texas Pacific Coal & Oil Co. v. StuardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  5. Leonard v. PraterTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Ridge Oil Co., Inc. v. Guinn Investments, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Simmons v. California Institute of TechnologyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Cameron v. LebowCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1960
  4. Ireland v. CraggsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1932
  5. Cocke v. Vacuum Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1933

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API