Cosden Oil Co. v. Scarborough
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge.
rni . . _ n f us is an appeal from a decree finding a-ppellant, defendant below, m default m the performance of implied covenants to prosecute with reasonable diligence the development for oil and gas of a tract of 400 acres of land, assigned to it by the lessee of a tract of 10,254 acres, and directing, upon pam of cancellaaon, that it pi oceed on terms fixed m the decree to drill at least one well thereon.
Appellant complains of ^ the decree as without evidence to support it. It contends that the evidence shows that the lands held by it are part of an indivisible…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Waggoner Estate v. Sigler Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1929
- Texas Pacific Coal & Oil Co. v. BarkerTexas Supreme Court · 1928
- Masterson v. Amarillo Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1923
- Texas Pacific Coal & Oil Co. v. StuardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
- Leonard v. PraterTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Ridge Oil Co., Inc. v. Guinn Investments, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2004
- Simmons v. California Institute of TechnologyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Cameron v. LebowCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1960
- Ireland v. CraggsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1932
- Cocke v. Vacuum Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1933
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.