Legal Opinion

Hodgman v. Cobb

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 6, 1922PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Henman, J.:

In the construction of wills each case must be determined on its own facts. We must find the intention of the testator. The clause in the will out of which the present litigation has arisen reads as follows:

“ Third. I give and bequeath to Angeline M. Cobb, wife of A. H. Cobb, Ten thousand dollars to be placed on interest and the annual interest thereupon to be paid said Angeline M. Cobb during her natural life, and at her decease, the said Ten thousand dollars with accrued interest thereon, to be given to her son, Frederick D. Cobb when of age — but if the said Frederick D. Cobb…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. King v. . TalbotNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
  2. Woodward v. . JamesNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  3. Brown v. . SpohrNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
  4. Smith v. . Van OstrandNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  5. Bliven v. . SeymourNew York Court of Appeals · 1882

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Buder v. FranzCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
  2. In re the Estate of MahlstedtNew York Surrogate's Court · 1931
  3. In re the Estate of SweeneyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1935
  4. In re the Final Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of VictorinNew York Surrogate's Court · 1927
  5. In re the Estate of TaylorNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API