Legal Opinion

Fritz v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 7, 1924No. 24,433PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMyers, J.

Appellant was found guilty in the Howard Circuit Court of violating a certain provision of §8356d Burns’ Supp. 1921, Acts 1921 p. 736, §1, amending Acts 1917 p. 15, §4. He was adjudged to pay a fine and to be restrained on the Indiana State Farm for a definite period. The trial court overruled his motion. for a new trial, and that ruling is here assigned as error. The causes stated in the motion, material to this appeal, are that the finding of the court was not sustained by sufficient evidence, and that it was contrary to law.

*244*243Appellant insists that there was no evidence to sustain the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Williams v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  2. State v. JacksonIndiana Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Harlan v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Strickland v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Mullinix v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1873

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Strickland v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Sears v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API