Legal Opinion

Strickland v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1909No. 21,320PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Prom Gibson Circuit Court; O. M. WeVborn, Judge. Prosecution by The State of Indiana against Horace Strickland. Prom a judgment of conviction, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

Appellant was convicted of selling intoxicating liquor as a druggist to one known to him to be in the habit of using such liquors as a beverage. The overruling of his motion for a new trial is assigned as error. The motion for a new trial charges error' in the admission of certain testimony, and that the finding of the court is not sustained by sufficient evidence and is contrary to law.

1. 2. *6443. *643The trial occurred in the court below May 13, 1908, and it appears from the record that, on May. 9 preceding, the prosecuting attorney served notice in writing upon appellant’s attorneys to produce at…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cleveland, Columbus, Cincinnati & Indianapolis Railway Co. v. ClosserIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Clem v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1869
  3. Harlan v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Baker v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1870
  5. Mullinix v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1873

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. JacksonIndiana Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Johnson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Woodall v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. Quassy v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. Butler v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API