State ex rel. Glancey v. St. Paul
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Application by the state, on the relation of Thomas Glancey and others, for writ of mandamus to John St. Paul, judge of the civil district court, and others.
1Opinion of the Court
Statement of the Case.
NICHOLLS, J.
This application is based upon the following allegations:
That relators are the heirs of the íate Owen Glancey, whose succession has been opened in the civil district court. That in *1067certain proceedings had in said succession, relating to the necessity of the appointment of a dative executor, certain evidence was taken in shorthand by the official stenographer of said civil district court, Division O.
That relators, having been cast in the proceedings, and desiring to appeal from the judgment rendered against them, which appeal is cognizable by this honorable…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Moore v. MuseTexas Supreme Court · 1877
- Compton v. AirialSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1854
- Pickell v. OwenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1885
- State ex rel. Blum v. WellsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1903
- State ex rel. Legendre v. Clerk of the Civil District Court for the Parish of OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1895
3Cited by4 opinions
- Dauenhauer v. RossnerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1919
- Mundy v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1917
- Shreveport Window Glass Co. v. Railroad CommissionSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1918
- Xavier Realty, Ltd. v. Louisiana Ry. & Nav. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1905