Compton v. Airial
Supreme Court of Louisiana
APPEAL from the District Court of the Parish of Rapides, Cushman, J. Borgstede v. Clark, 5 An. 295; Kelly v. Cilly, 5 An. 534: City of Lafayette v. Parish Judge of Jefferson, 8 R. 5 ; Prieur et al. v. Commercial Bank, 7 L. 510. As to effect and mode of execution of judgment of Supreme Court in a case of this kind, see 6 R. 92.
1Opinion of the CourtBuchanan, J.
Plaintiff appeals from the refusal of the District Judge to grant a peremptory mandamus upon the Clerk of the District Court, commanding him to issue a fieri facias for arrears of alimony exceeding three hundred dollars, due under an interlocutory decree in a suit pending in said court, between the plaintiff and her husband.
It is for the court which has rendered the judgment, to regulate the manner of its execution (O. P. 629); and we are indisposed to interfere with this legal prerogative of the court of the first instance, unless the record presents a clear case of denial of justice or…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Cotton v. WrightSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1939
- Snow v. SnowSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1937
- Baker v. JewellSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1905
- Moseley v. CollinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1901
- Gallant v. GallantMississippi Supreme Court · 1929
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.