Legal Opinion

Stokes v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided January 4, 1938No. 8609PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge.

Appellants were prosecuted under an indictment charging in count 1, that on the 8th day of May, 1937, "One Stokes and one Olson did unlawfully, wilfully and knowingly possess distilled spirits, etc.,” and in count 2 that on the same day, “One Stokes and One Olson did unlawfully transport distilled spirits.”

On the ground that the evidence did not sufficiently connect Olson with the offense charged in the first count, or Stokes with that charged in the second count, the District Attorney moved at its close that a verdict be directed as to Olson on the first count, and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pointer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. De Luca v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924
  3. Sasser v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1928
  4. Chapman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1925
  5. State v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1875

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Henry Dewitt Ingram v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1959
  2. United States v. ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939
  3. Martin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1938
  4. United States v. MonjarCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1945
  5. Ward v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1938

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API