Legal Opinion

Scarborough v. Beardmore

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1932No. 5832PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YARIAN, J. —

Proceeding under the Workmen’s Compensation Act. In March, 1929, Charles Scarborough, aged fifty-four, employed by respondent Beardmore as a millwright in a sawmill, while lifting a steel shaft weighing one hundred fifty or one hundred seventy-five pounds, was seized with a severe pain in the small of • his back. The Industrial Accident Board awarded compensation, which award was set aside by the district court on appeal. Scarborough appealed from the judgment of the district court but died, February 11, 1932, while this appeal was pending. Upon stipulation, an order was duly…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McNeil v. Panhandle Lumber Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1921
  2. In Re LarsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Hanson v. Independent School District 11-JIdaho Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Strouse v. Hercules Mining Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Webb v. New Mexico Pub. Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Reynolds v. Ruidoso Racing Association, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Miller v. Bingham CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Swan v. WilliamsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Woodbury v. Frank B. Arata Fruit Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1942

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API