Legal Opinion · Dissent

White v. Thaler

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided June 30, 2010No. 06-20736Published

1DissentEdith H. Jones, Chief Judge

With due respect, I dissent from the majority’s decision to grant habeas corpus relief on the basis of ineffective assistance of trial counsel. AEDPA mandates that *913we apply a “doubly deferential judicial review” to ineffectiveness claims. Knowles v. Mirzayance, — U.S. -, 129 S.Ct. 1411, 1420, 173 L.Ed.2d 251 (2009). The majority, in effect, hold otherwise.

This is not a case where exculpatory evidence was concealed from the jury or where counsel failed to uncover evidence that could have assisted the defense. This was a fully and carefully tried case featuring many eyewitnesses to the crimes…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Bell v. ConeSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. Schriro v. LandriganSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Knowles v. MirzayanceSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. Woodford v. VisciottiSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API