Legal Opinion

Wolfe v. Town of Windham

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided October 31, 1974No. 6939Published

1Opinion of the Court

114 N.H. 695 (1974)

HAROLD A. WOLFE AND GERTRUDE E. WOLFE

v.

TOWN OF WINDHAM.

No. 6939.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire.

October 31, 1974.

John B. Ford, by brief and orally, for the plaintiffs.

Grinnell & Bureau and Roland E. Morneau, Jr. (Mr. Morneau orally) for defendant.

KENISON, C.J.

Plaintiffs appealed to the superior court pursuant to RSA 238:4 for an assessment of damages arising from a discontinuance of a road by the town of Windham. Trial by jury resulted in a verdict for the town. Plaintiffs' exceptions to certain jury instructions given by the trial judge were reserved and transferred by…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Piper v. MeredithSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1970
  2. Cram v. LaconiaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1901
  3. Tilton v. SharpeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1931
  4. St. Regis Paper Co. v. New Hampshire Water Resources BoardSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1942
  5. Candia v. ChandlerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1877

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API