Legal Opinion

Ex parte Goldsmith

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 2, 1908PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Certiorari to Clay Circuit Court; Frank Smith, Judge;

1Per curiam

The town of Piggott passed an ordinance declaring that the owning, operating or maintaining a pool table within the limits of said town was a nuisance, and provided for penalties against any one violating its provisions. ■ Goldsmith was prosecuted under said ordinance, and fined several times in the mayor’s court, and he took appeals from so many of said fines as he was able to secure bondsmen to the circuit court. He petitioned the circuit court for a writ of certiorari, setting forth ■said ordinance and the prosecutions under it and the pending and threatened prosecutions, and alleged facts…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Burgett v. AppersonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1889
  2. Reese v. CannonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Lamb & Rhodes v. HowtonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
  2. Switzer v. GoldenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1955
  3. Waltman v. AustinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Browning v. WaldripSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
  5. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1955

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API