Legal Opinion
Hudson v. Kuszynski
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided October 26, 1943No. File No. 34420PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The defendant in error recovered judgment in an action of summary process, tried before a justice of the peace, for possession of a New Haven apartment occupied by the plaintiffs in error. The latter bring this writ of error to reverse the judgment, assigning the action of the trial justice as having been erroneous in two material matters:
1. In holding the notice to quit, served on the plaintiffs in error at the direction of the defendant in error, adequate and sufficient.
2. In holding that the defendant in error, by a claimed acceptance of rent, did not waive his right to proceed with the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Stokes v. . Continental Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1906
- Johnston v. . HughesNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
- Noll v. MoranSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Pennsylvania R.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1903
- Stromberg v. Western Telephone Construction Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1900
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hour Publishing Co. v. GorezConnecticut Appellate Court · 1968
- Tuttle v. MartinConnecticut Superior Court · 1975
- United Illuminating Co. v. Syntex Rubber Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1966
- City of Bridgeport v. Barbour-Daniel Electronics, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1988
- Harved Realty v. Leekoff, No. Sph 94367 (Nov. 24, 1998)Connecticut Superior Court · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.