Noll v. Moran
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Writ op error to reverse an alleged erroneous judgment of the City Court of Hartford, Calnen, Acting-Judge, in an action of summary process, awarding the possession of certain leased premises to the plaintiffs in that action (defendants herein), brought to the January Term, 1920, of this court at Hartford. The defendants in error filed a plea in abatement in this court, to which the plaintiffs in error demurred.
1Opinion of the CourtCase, J.
The plea in abatement is overruled. Its essential basis is that the claimed errors assigned are either not apparent on the face of the record, or where they do so appear, that they present only questions of fact rather than of law.. Certain of the assignments of error are open to neither of these criticisms, and present questions of law fairly disclosed by the bill of exceptions, and reviewable upon the facts open to us in that part of the record.
Nor is there merit in the claim suggested by the plea, that the writ is bad in its entirety because the plaintiffs in error have sought a review of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Williams v. Apothecaries Hall Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1908
- Hoey v. HoeySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1870
3Cited by12 opinions
- Webb v. AmblerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
- Arey v. WardenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- O'Keefe v. Atlantic Refining Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
- Leitzes v. F. L. Caulkins Auto Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
- Vogel v. BacusSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.