In re the Estate of Heaney
New York Surrogate's Court
1Opinion of the Court
Wingate, S.
This proceeding arises upon a contest interposed against the account of the executrix. The objections are of a twofold nature, first, as to certain payments set forth in the accounts; and second, as a result of her rejection of a claim of the objector upon a promissory note in the sum of $11,000.
The objections of the first class are not sustained by the testimony. The reasonableness of the funeral bill was conceded on the record. The claims of Daniel O’Brien and William L. O’Malley were proved by unimpeached testimony and no evidence was adduced in support of the objections to the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Phelps' v. . PondNew York Court of Appeals · 1861
- Harris v. . ClarkNew York Court of Appeals · 1849
- Dougherty v. . SaltNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Holmes v. . RoperNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
- Blanshan v. RussellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re the Estate of LudlamNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936
- In re the Estate of BarkerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936
- In re the Estate of RayNew York Surrogate's Court · 1930