Legal Opinion
3-D Electric Co. v. Barnett Construction Co.
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
Decided January 30, 1986No. 05-84-01107-CVPublishedCited by 67 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MALONEY, Justice.
3-D Electric Company, Inc. (“3-D”) appeals the trial court’s order which sustained Barnett Construction Company’s special appearance and dismissed the suit. 3-D contends that the trial court erred in granting the motion challenging jurisdiction, in failing to file findings of fact and conclusions of law, and in applying new law retrospectively. For the following reasons, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
In 1979, J.C. Harville, the president of Metropolitan Contractors, Inc. (“Metropolitan”), a Tennessee corporation engaged in business as a general contractor,…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by67 opinions
- BMC Software Belgium, NV v. MarchandTexas Supreme Court · 2002
- Preussag Aktiengesellschaft v. Coleman, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2000
- El Puerto De Liverpool, S.A. De C v. v. Servi Mundo Llantero S.A. De C.V., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2002
- Blair Communications, Inc. v. Ses Survey Equipment Services, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2002
- Trailways, Inc. v. Clark, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1990
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.