Legal Opinion

Reichenbach v. United Masonic Benefit Ass'n

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 24, 1891PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Hon. Daniel Dillon, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtBiggs, J.

There are two counts and two causes of action stated in the petition. The first count is based on a certificate of insurance, number 1304, for $1,000, issued by the defendant on the life of the plaintiff’s deceased husband. The defense to this cause of action was that, *78in 1885, the policy was allowed to lapse by the voluntary act of the insured. The jury found for the defendant on this count, and the court entered judgment accordingly. The cause of action stated in the second count is predicated on a like certificate, number 2499, for $2,000. The defense to this was, that the deceased failed…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kerr v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1884
  2. State ex rel. Lingenfelder v. LewisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1888
  3. State ex rel. Heye v. St. Louis Court of AppealsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1885

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Douglas v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1898
  2. Reichenbach v. United Masonic Benefit Ass'nSupreme Court of Missouri · 1892

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API