State ex rel. Heye v. St. Louis Court of Appeals
Supreme Court of Missouri
Mandamos* The constitution allows an appeal to the Supreme Court “in all cases where the amount in dispute, exclusive of costs, exceeds the sum of two thousand and five hundred dollars.” Const., art. -6, sec. 12. The “amount in dispute,” means the amount of money that it would fake to settle the dispute, which is $2199$-90, the amount of the judgment recovered in the cause. Mosher r. Shear, 100 111. 469; Gray n.
Read the full summary
Mandamos* The constitution allows an appeal to the Supreme Court “in all cases where the amount in dispute, exclusive of costs, exceeds the sum of two thousand and five hundred dollars.” Const., art. -6, sec. 12. The “amount in dispute,” means the amount of money that it would fake to settle the dispute, which is $2199$-90, the amount of the judgment recovered in the cause. Mosher r. Shear, 100 111. 469; Gray n. Blanchard, 7 Otto, 564; Tdntsman v. Bank, 10 Otto, 6. The amount recovered being less than twenty-five hundred dollars, the court of appeals has jurisdiction of .the cause. The amount…
1Opinion of the CourtNobton, J.
This is a proceeding by mandamus to compel the St. Louis court of appeals to proceed to hear and determine a certain cause pending in said court, on the appeal of defendant in said cause from a judgment of the circuit court of the city of St. Louis. It appears . from the record that the relatrix instituted a suit in said circuit court on a penal bond, in the sum of twenty-seven, hundred dollars ; that her damages were assessed at the sum of twenty-two hundred dollars, and that judgment was rendered for twenty-seven hundred dollars, the amount of the penalty, and also judgment awarding…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State ex rel. Cochran v. CooperSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
- State ex rel. Reyburn v. RugglesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1854
- The United States v. McDowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1808
- Page & Bacon v. ButlerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1851
3Cited by10 opinions
- Douglas v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1898
- McGregor v. PollardSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895
- State ex rel. Lingenfelder v. LewisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1888
- Pittsburg Bridge Co. v. St. Louis Transit Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1907
- Sleyster v. Eugene Donzelot & SonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1929
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.