Legal Opinion
Hardy v. Kohl
District Court, M.D. Florida
Decided May 13, 2025No. 6:23-cv-01526Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION LENORRIS E. HARDY, Plaintiff, v. Case No: 6:23-cv-1526-JSS-RMN M4 ORLANDO TENANT, LLC, Defendant. ___________________________________/ ORDER Defendant moves for summary judgment. (Dkt. 54.) Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, did not oppose Defendant’s motion. Plaintiff also untimely moves for summary judgment (Dkt. 59) and for leave to file his untimely motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 60). Defendant opposes Plaintiff’s motion for leave. (Dkt. 61). For the reasons outlined below, Defendant’s motion for summary judgment is…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Crawford-El v. BrittonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.