State v. Matheson
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
POMEROY, Justice.
With the marked increase in the number of prosecutions had for alleged violations of various “drug” statutes, the “entrapment” issue is being raised with increasing frequency. Occasion for the raising of this issue results naturally from the fact that the technique most commonly employed in the detection of violations of these statutes is the use of undercover agents of the State and purchases by such agents of drugs from the person thereafter indicted and charged with illegal sale of drugs.
This case now before us raises such issue and provides us with occasion to discuss…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Sorrells v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Sherman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- State v. BatisteSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1978
- State v. GibbonsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
- State v. GoyetteSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
- State v. LittlefieldSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
- State v. RiceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1977
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.