Legal Opinion
Martinez v. United States Sugar Corp.
District Court, M.D. Florida
Decided March 16, 1995No. 93-80-CIV-FTM-17DPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR JUDGMENT
KOVACHEVICH, District Judge.
This cause is before the Court on Plaintiffs Motion to Supplement Exhibit #39 (Docket 80) and Defendant’s Motions for Rule 52(c) Judgment (Docket 90) and to Strike (Docket 92), as well as the various Responses and Replies to those Motions (Dockets 81, 82, 97, 99 and 101). The Motion for Judgment was filed at the conclusion of the Plaintiffs ease-in-chief at trial.
I. Standards
In considering a Rule 52(c) motion, the Court is the trier of fact. If the Court decides to grant a Rule 52(c) judgment on partial findings, it must weigh all…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Carl A. Green v. Union FoundryCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
- Gladstone v. Stuart Cinemas, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2005
- Darden v. CARDINAL TRAVEL CENTERDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2007
- Nash v. Consolidated City of JacksonvilleDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1995
- Bullock v. WidnallDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1996
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.