Legal Opinion
State v. Richards
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided December 28, 2001No. 26130-8-IIPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtQuinn-Brintnall, J.
— Steven Ivor Richards TV appeals his conviction of two counts of forgery (Count I and Count II), arguing that the State provided insufficient evidence to support either count and that the trial court erred in allowing the State to file an amended information after the speedy trial period expired. We reverse in part, finding insufficient evidence to support Count I, but affirm the forgery conviction alleged in Count II of the amended information.
*650Facts
On June 10, 1997, Washington State Patrol Trooper Jacob McMillen was on routine patrol when he saw a motorcycle lying on its side at the edge of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. SalinasWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. KnapstadWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996
- State v. WassonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
- State v. McKeownCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Brooks v. City of SeattleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- State v. RichardsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
- State v. CannonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
- Howard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2004
- State v. SchalerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.