Legal Opinion

Howard v. State

Court of Appeals of Alaska

Decided November 26, 2004No. A-8491PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COATS, Chief Judge.

Jarsis Jamar Howard appeals his convictions for forgery in the second degree and resisting arrest. The State charged Howard with forgery for identifying himself as Omari S. Russell and signing Russell's name on a traffic ticket for speeding. Howard argues that the State did not establish the element of the offense of forgery that Howard had an intent to defraud Russell. We conclude that the State did prove this element. On the resisting arrest charge, the State presented evidence that Howard ran away from a state trooper and then hid in the woods. The State's only…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Tesoro Alaska Petroleum Co. v. Kenai Pipe Line Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Dorman v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Muller v. BP Exploration (Alaska) Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State v. WassonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. Martin v. City of FairbanksAlaska Supreme Court · 1969

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rich v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  2. Commonwealth v. GrantMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2008
  3. Eide v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2007
  4. Eide v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API